Roy Marshall,
'Gopagilla' (Crystal Clear Creators)
Laressa Dickey,
'Companions, Corps of Discovery' (Miel Books)
Amy De'ath, 'Erec and
Enide' (Salt Publishing)
I
have a (as yet untested) notion that the quality of most published poetry is higher than it was back in the days when output was controlled by a few
London publishing houses, and most published poets were educated at Oxford. My
contention is supported by three pamphlets I picked up at the Leicester book
fair back in March. All three poets are at the beginning of their careers, or
at least of their careers as published poets, although I believe that Roy
Marshall, the oldest of the three, has been writing poetry for some time, and
has recently returned after a long lay-off (usually a good sign).
Of
these three, Roy Marshall's poetry is the most conventional; his writing
contains emotional responses to observed events, subjective commentary on the
external world and employs pathos in description of such things as family bonds
and the passage of time, all of which is executed with enviable skill. What
marks this poet out from many writing in a similar vein is the knack for
highlighting the particulars that capture an emotion or encapsulate a story:
The circuitry of crickets on the air,
his red wine and cigarette breath,
a sickle and scythe laid aside,
and rosemary scent, rising.
The valley draped in wood-smoke webs,
my hair ruffled by his hardened hand...
Close
observation, combined with beautifully-judged phrasing. Wayne Burrows, in his foreword,
talks of Marshall's '...compression and unforced lyricism..' which is about
right, but such attributes don't come without hard work and a long poetic
apprenticeship; both of which Marshall evidently put in before bringing out
this first slim collection. This pamphlet comes from the excellent series of
first collections by Leicester-based Crystal Clear Creators.
Marshall's
poems have a theme of family history and reconciliation running through them. I
quote the following poem in full to show the skill and economy at work here:
National Service
Smaller wars can be fogotten between wars;
afterwards wars, the months and years of enforced
peace.
A man of my Dad's generation told me how
you could go from Nissan hut and blancoed coal
to Korea, in a week, how a lad might replace a
sentry
who'd been shot that evening;
how, at nineteen, you might catch shrapnel
in your spine and wheel-chair bound
get home to find your teens at an end
and the swinging sixties just beginning.
Laressa
Dickey is American, and writes a poetry which is in a recognizably American
style; spare and laconic, with its cadences rooted in everyday speech, not
dissimilar to the poetry of Shannon Tharp, whom I recently reviewed. Compared
to Marshall, Dickey's verse is more abstract, and its effects are reinforced by
its spacing on the page. Phrases are lifted from their surrounding language to
float as self-contained linguistic units.
You can go where you are not wanted
think those places slowly
without actually breaking skin
The
impression I got from this poetry was rootlessness and distance; something
reflecting perhaps the vast physical dimensions of the USA. I was confirmed in
this feeling by reading the afterword, in which Dickey says:
'In
my imagination, since I was a young girl, Amelia Earhart has been crossing the
ocean and roaming the skies continuously. The memory of flight, the memory of
roaming'.
The
poems also touch on the domestic lives of women. Dickey asks 'what is it to be
a women living - with what am I to concern myself.' The poems address this question in snatches
of words, like entries in a notebook:
Pretend love is a rocket, small salad greens
I note the seasons
I want to be a beautiful
answerphone
impromptu meetings on limestone hills
When
reading these poems I found myself, rather than reading serially, instead
scanning the page, and flicking back and forwards in the book, which seems to
be a way to let these pieces of language work their meditative effects:
go farther down to board
That evening I was quiet
I believed a song was boarding
The
most linguistically innovative poet of these three is Amy De'Ath. The medieval
story of Eric and Enide provides a loose framework around which youthful poems
of love and desire are constructed, alongside more literary and intertextual
poems. The poetry is clearly influenced by Language poetry, and the notes at
the back reference Chretien de Troyes, Emily Dickinson, Virgil and John Clare.
The language is woven from statements and phrases which at times appear to make
sense, and to relate to the adjacent phrases, but most often veer in unexpected
and disorienting directions.In this, De'Ath reminds me of the British poets of
the 1940s who are being recovered and used as models by many left-field contemporary
poets. Here's a poet writing in 1942:
Should I be here in this rare scaffolding
Clutching the promise of primrose?
You with a yokel handful of blight
Pitching your jacket on gowan,
Conceal the hollow in the core of love
For fear will fast after it move.
and
here's De'Ath.
How to glide on promise
hunted hunted honed the sky
alone lacking ground a sky
alone on the border of a shadow
of a cloud betrothed and hunted
down.
What's
common here is both the lyric impulse, and the denial of a foothold for the
reader, thus keeping the attention at surface level, at the level of the
language itself. This produces some beautiful effects, and provides an
invigorating read; although it's hard on the reader, in comparison with the
direct statement and connection with the external world provided by a poet like
Roy Marshall.
It
should go without saying that I'd recommend anyone to buy and read these three
poets.
Anyone recognize the 1940s poet?
No comments:
Post a Comment